Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Author: huss

August undefined, 2024

WebMysore Chromite Limited . Case Information CITATION CODES citation codes CASE NO. On Appeal from the Judgment and Order dated the 29th day of March, 1951 of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Case Referred No. 44 of 1948.,Civil Appeal No. 117 of 1953, decided on 1st day of November, 1954 ATTORNEY(S) WebJan 11, 2024 · Relaxation Of The Penalty under Section 271DA For Violation Of Section 269ST Of The Income Tax Act 1961. The Finance Act 2024 introduced a new section 269ST w.e.f. 01.04.17 as follows –. “no person shall receive an amount of two lakh rupees or more—. (a) in aggregate from a person in a day; or.

Contracts-II Latest PDF Law And Economics Justice - Scribd

WebJUSTICE VISWANATHA SASTRI Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras - Appellant Versus Mysore Chromite Limited - Respondent Case No : No Decided On : 29 March 1951. … WebApr 9, 2016 · The management and control of the assessee company was vested in Messrs. Oakley Bowden & Co. (Madras) Ltd., another private limited company … great google slides themes

LL.B. VI Term LB-604 Principles of Taxation Law

WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v/sMysore Chromite Limited Case Referred 44 of 1948 Decided On, 29 March 1951 At, High Court of Judicature at Madras By, THE … WebJul 27, 2015 · Podar Cement Private Limited (1997) 226 ITR 625 and Mysore Minerals v CIT 106 Taxman 166 the legal position is no longer res integra. In Podar Cement Private Limited the Supreme Court was called upon to consider whether the income derived by the assessee on the flat or the building were income from other sources and not income from … http://lawfaculty.du.ac.in/files/course_material/VI_Term2024/LB-604%20Principles%20of%20Taxation%20Law.pdf flixbus student discount reddit

mysore+minerals+ltd Indian Case Law Law CaseMine

A Note on State of Madras v. Ramalingam & Co., A.I.R. 1956 Mad.

Websentative of some of the Indian chromite deposits in Andhra, Bihar, Orissa, Mysore and Madras, and include one specimen from Baluchistan in Pakistan. The location of the … WebMysore Chromite Limited [1954] INSC 106 (1 November 1954) January February March April May June July August September October November December. The … great googly moogly monsters inchttp://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM41/AM41_460.pdf flixbus student discount us

"WebCIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98. 37. P.S.N.S. Ambalavana Chettiar v. Express Newspapers Ltd. (1968) 2 SCR 239 : AIR 1968 SC 741. 38. Agricultural Market Committee v. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. (1997) 5 SCC 516 : AIR 1997 SC 2502. 39. Pearson v. " - Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Cit vs mysore chromite ltd

Supreme Court Judgments: November, 1954 Law Library

WebJan 14, 2013 · In the opinion of the CIT (Appeals), the language used in the rules clearly specified that enhanced depreciation allowance is available only when the trucks are … http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/ms-i-c-d-s-ltd-vs-commissioner-of-income-tax-mysore-anr

Did you know?

WebCommissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v/sMysore Chromite Limited Case Referred 44 of 1948 Decided On, 29 March 1951 At, High Court of Judicature at Madras By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYANARAYANA RAO & THE HONOURABLE MR. C. S. Rama Rao Saheb, T. T. Viswanatha Ayyar, Advocates. Judgment Text … WebVodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. Assistant CIT, 2010 Tax LR, 618 (Ker) 14. State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. ... CIT V/s Mysore Chromite Ltd.; 1955, 1 SCR 849. 2. Badri Prasad V/s State of M.P.; 1965, 3 SCR 381. 3. ... The Mogu Liner Ltd. Vs. Manipal Printers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1991 Ker, 183 5. Indian Airlines Vs.

WebApr 29, 2011 · Cited By: 1. Coram: 1. ...concluded by a decision of this Court in IT Ref. No. 312 of 1961 in the case of CIT vs. Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd., judgment wherein was...of this Court in IT Ref. No. 166 of 1985 in the case of CIT vs. New India Sugar Mills judgment wherein was delivered on 12th April, 1990...assessee. 5. WebCIT v. Mysore Sugar Co. Ltd. - Taxpublishers.in User Panel Home Income Tax Case Laws Analysis Relied on Nortel Networks India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT 2024 TaxPub (DT) 6419 (Del …

WebFeb 8, 2000 · The High Court relying on its own decision in Ramkumar Mills P. Ltd. v. CIT [1989] 180 ITR 464, answered the question in the affirmative, that is, against the assessee. The aggrieved assessee has preferred this appeal pursuant to a certificate under section 261 of the Act granted by the High Court. WebMar 9, 2024 · PR CIT Vs LH Sugar Factory Pvt Ltd (D ated: February 27, 2024) On appeal, the Supreme Court condones the delay and grants leave to the Revenue to defend their case against M/s L H Sugar Factory in relation to issue of carbon credit. 2024-TIOL-102-SC-IT CIT Vs Balak Capital Pvt Ltd (D ated: February 27, 2024)

WebA Note on State of Madras v. Ramalingam & Co., A.I.R. 1956 Mad. 695 - Mahalinga Padmanabhan - There would seem to be a conflict between this decision and the one reported in Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras v. Mysore Chromite Ltd., (S) AIR 1955 SC 98. The main point in controversy is whether the paying or negotiating or the …

WebJun 30, 2024 · CIT v. Mysore Chromite Ltd. (1955) 1 SCR 849 : AIR 1955 SC 98 indiankanoon.org link casemine.com link legitquest.com link Civil Appeal No. 117 of 1953 … flixbus strasbourg pragueWeb2 I.C.D.S Ltd v. CIT [2013] 29 taxmann.com 129 (SC) The Supreme Court in the case of Poddar Cement (P.) Ltd.3 and Mysore Minerals Ltd.4 observed that it is the beneficial ownership and not the titular ownership that is relevant for a valid claim of depreciation allowance under the Act. However, in the instant case, the Supreme Court flixbus student discount code flixbus swanseaWebCIT vs Divine Leasing and Finance Ltd., General Exports and Credits Ltd., Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. Citation 299 ITR 268 197 Taxation 43 158 Taxman 440 207 CTR 38 LexReported COCA-COLA EXPORT CORPORATION vs ITO and ANR.Applied 231 ITR 200 CIT vs Stellar Investment Ltd Distinguished and explained 192 ITR 287 Nirma Industries Ltd. … great google font combinationsWebMysore Chromite Limited . DAS, J.— This is an appeal from the judgment pronounced by the High Court of Judicature at Madras on 29th March, 1951 on a consolidated reference … great googly moogly zappaWebThe Assessee is Mysore Chromite, Limited, a company registered under the Mysore Company Regulations. Its registered office is at Sinduvalli in Mysore State. It acquired … great goose logisticsWebMar 11, 2011 · Mysore Minerals Ltd. (2) 2001 250 ITR...725 Kar This was a case in respect of mining of granite. The Division Bench held that it would amount to manufacture relying on an earlier judgment in CIT v. Mysore Minerals Ltd. (1... Deputy Commissioner Of … flixbus suhl